Test Incentives For Organ Donations - 1027 Words

No one wants to voluntarily sign up for an unnecessary surgery, which is why there is a five to ten year wait limit for an organ donation. The New York Times Article â€Å"Test Incentives for Organ Donations – There’s No Reason Not To,† written by Sally Satel, states that in order to raise the number of donations, people should be rewarded (Satel). Based on the statistics Satel provides, she says altruism is not producing enough donations. Instead, she believes the government should offer some form of incentive to lure people into doing a good deed (Satel). Satel’s article does develop solid points to teach readers about her topic effectively while simultaneously providing evidence to endorse her argument. She gets her purpose across by†¦show more content†¦She productively argues that not enough deceased donations will be enough to satisfy the wait limit (Satel). Satel’s purpose here is to let her readers know that patients in need o f a transplant do not have all the time in the world to wait for someone to save their life. She wants people to understand that waiting until death to donate organs kills others in the process of time. Not enough people die a day that actually qualify as organ donors to help the 100,000 people on the wait list (Satel). Satel uses this information as evidence as to why we need incentives for people to donate their organs; there is simply not enough willing participants that want to save another person’s life. Satel’s purpose was to inform readers of the crucial need of organ donors, which she believes can be solved by incentives (Satel). She managed this argument effectively by connecting the problem to someone’s reality while addressing the issue with practical evidence. Since her purpose was executed flawlessly, so was her evidence. Every new issue that was brought up had supporting information that validated it. She admitted that many people would assu me incentives for organ donations would just act as another way for the rich to feed off the poor. To counter that, she says, â€Å"the demographics of the waiting list indicate that recipients, themselves, are likely to be low-income† (Satel). Her next piece of evidence states that young people would also be interested